No. While many Philodendrons are climbers or hemiepiphytes, others grow as terrestrial creepers or self-supporting shrubs. Botanically, true Philodendrons fall into three major growth categories:
- Climbing (hemiepiphytic) — e.g. Philodendron melanochrysum, P. hederaceum
- Creeping (rhizomatous) — e.g. Philodendron gloriosum, P. mamei
- Self-supporting (compact, non-vining) — e.g. Philodendron 'Birkin', P. squamiferum
💡 Why aren't "tree-like Philodendrons" actually Philodendrons anymore?
Large upright species like Philodendron bipinnatifidum and P. selloum used to be classified within the genus — but that changed after detailed anatomical and molecular studies revealed they’re genetically and structurally distinct.
A 2020 study by Ferreira et al. found that these species, formerly part of subgenus Meconostigma, have adventitious roots with a lobed stele, unlike the cylindrical stele seen in true Philodendron species (subgenera Philodendron and Pteromischum).
Molecular and cytological research by Sakuragui et al. (2018) confirmed that Meconostigma species form a separate evolutionary lineage — with different chromosomes, floral structures, and growth strategies.
Result? The subgenus Meconostigma was reclassified as a separate genus:
Thaumatophyllum Schott
This includes:
- Thaumatophyllum bipinnatifidum (formerly Philodendron selloum)
- T. xanadu
- T. stenolobum
📌 These species are no longer considered Philodendron by Kew, WFO, or other taxonomic authorities. Many shops and nurseries still list them under their old names — but botanically, that’s outdated.
💡 If your “self-heading Philodendron” has thick, woody stems and a shrubby form, it’s probably a Thaumatophyllum.